State Of Louisiana v. Chris Joseph Robin

• Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
• Decided: January 13, 2025
• Docket: 2024KW1126
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

A13AM* A NMAVV 71

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2024 KW 1126

VERSUS

CHRIS JOSEPH ROBIN JANUARY 13, 2025

In Re: Chris Joseph Robin, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, Nos.

5325- F- 2021, 5326- M- 2021.

BEFORE: THERIOT, HESTER, AND EDWARDS, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Counsel failed to comply with the

requirements of Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules

2- 13 and 4- 3 by failing to timely file the instant writ application within thirty days of the district court' s ruling or include documentation of a motion for an extension of the return date within the writ application. Additionally, counsel failed to

comply with Rules 4- 5( C)( 7), ( 10), & ( 11) by failing to include a copy of the bill of information, pertinent court minutes, and any opposition and or any attachments filed by a party in the trial court or a statement by the applicant that no opposing written document was filed. Furthermore, although it is not a violation of the Uniform Rules, it is noted that relator failed to include a

copy of a transcript of the proceedings at issue and a copy of any exhibits introduced at the hearing. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So. 2d 710 ( La.), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 896, 104 S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation of this writ

application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules

2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event relator elects to file a new application with this court, the application shall be filed on or before

February 19, 2025, and should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items, and a copy of this ruling.

MRT CHH BDE

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT