State of Louisiana v. Chasity Andrews
This text of State of Louisiana v. Chasity Andrews (State of Louisiana v. Chasity Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2019-KA-0606
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL
C.A. * FOURTH CIRCUIT
* STATE OF LOUISIANA
*
* *******
LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART WITH REASONS.
I concur with the majority’s finding that the criminal district court
lacked jurisdiction over Defendant to try her for the offense of indecent
behavior with a juvenile. However, I respectfully dissent from majority’s
finding that the criminal court lacked jurisdiction on the charges of
aggravated rape. I find that Defendant was correctly tried in criminal court
on the charge of aggravated rape in light of the Louisiana Supreme Court
case of State v. I.C.S.,13-1023, p. 8 (La. 7/1/14), 145 So.3d 350, 354 (where
the Court endorsed the prosecution in criminal court of two defendants, ages
20 and 21, indicted on two counts of aggravated rape and one count of
indecent behavior with a juvenile arising from conduct committed when they
were 12 and 13 years old stating that “Art. 857(C)(2) applies to the
defendants in this case, and that they, accordingly, ‘shall be prosecuted as an
adult in the appropriate court exercising criminal jurisdiction.’ La. Child.
Code art. 857 (C)(2)”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Louisiana v. Chasity Andrews, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-chasity-andrews-lactapp-2020.