State Of Louisiana v. Cameron Williams
This text of State Of Louisiana v. Cameron Williams (State Of Louisiana v. Cameron Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2019 KW 0643
VERSUS
CAMERON P. WILLIAMS JUL 222019
In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,
22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 526, 869.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, HIGGINBOTHAM, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The March 21, 2019, ruling of the trial
court granting the pro se motion to reconsider sentence " to the extent of my jurisdiction, to consider the matter" is reversed.
Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 881. 1( A)( 1) is triggered by operation of law," unless the trial court
specifically allows for a longer period." ( Emphasis added).
See State v. Williams, 2016- 0007 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 3/ 16), 2016 WL 3131664 ( unpublished), writ denied, 2016- 1280 ( La. 9/ 6/ 17), 226 So. 3d 433. In the instant case, on March 21, 2019,
the trial judge stated he intended to extend the time for filing a motion for reconsideration of sentence from thirty days to five years from resentencing. He did not, however, set forth that period at resentencing on September 29, 2015. Thus, the period for seeking reconsideration of sentence was thirty days from resentencing. See State v. Neville, 95- 0547 ( La. App. 4th Cir. 5/ 16/ 95), 655 So. 2d 785, 786- 88, writ denied, 95- 1521 ( La. 9/ 29/ 95), 660 So. 2d 851. The defendant filed a counseled motion for reconsideration of sentence during this period, and the motion was denied. The trial court is without jurisdiction to consider the pro se motion for reconsideration of sentence,
which is untimely and successive. See La. Code Crim. P. art.
916( 3); State v. Gedric, 99- 1213 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 6/ 3/ 99), 741 So. 2d 849, 852 ( per curiam), writ denied, 99- 1830 ( La. 11/ 5/ 99), 751 So. 2d 239 ("[ a] n ` out -of -time' motion to reconsider sentence is not contemplated by the Code of Criminal Procedure nor
allowed by the jurisprudence."); State v. Perkins, 2008- 0078 La. App. 4th Cir. 6/ 25/ 08), 988 So. 2d 793, 801, writ denied, 2008- 1675 ( La. 3/ 4/ 09), 3 So. 3d 471 ("[ a] trial court may not
revisit a previously denied motion to reconsider [ sentence].").
PMC TMH WIL
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY C E K OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Of Louisiana v. Cameron Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-cameron-williams-lactapp-2019.