State of Louisiana v. Bueford
This text of 107 So. 516 (State of Louisiana v. Bueford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants were convicted of the crime of stealing $100 from the person of one Bradley Lafouse, in violation of Act No. 40 of 1914, p. 104. One of them, Norman Leake, afterwards broke jail and is a fugitive from justice. The Attorney General therefore filed a motion to dismiss Leake’s appeal, and his attorney agrees that the appeal should be dismissed. With regard to the other appellant, Armne Bueford, it is sufficient to say that there is no bill of exception in the record, no assignment of error, and, in fact, no error in the proceedings.
The appeal of Norman Leake is dismissed, and the verdict and sentence against Armne Bueford are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 So. 516, 160 La. 756, 1926 La. LEXIS 2438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-bueford-la-1926.