State of Louisiana v. Bryan S. Gibson
This text of State of Louisiana v. Bryan S. Gibson (State of Louisiana v. Bryan S. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment rendered March 3, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P.
No. 53,743-KA
COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
*****
STATE OF LOUISIANA Appellee
Versus
BRYAN S. GIBSON Appellant
Appealed from the First Judicial District Court for the Parish of Caddo, Louisiana Trial Court No. 354,739
Honorable John D. Mosely, Jr., Judge
LOUISIANA APPELLATE PROJECT Counsel for Appellant By: Peggy J. Sullivan
JAMES E. STEWART, SR. Counsel for Appellee District Attorney
TOMMY J. JOHNSON WILLIAM J. EDWARDS TRENEISHA J. HILL ALEX L. PORUBSKY Assistant District Attorneys
Before STONE, COX, and STEPHENS, JJ. STEPHENS, J.
This criminal appeal arises from the First Judicial District Court,
Parish of Caddo, the Honorable John Mosely, Jr., presiding. Defendant
Bryan S. Gibson was convicted by a non-unanimous jury of manslaughter
and sentenced to 35 years at hard labor. In light of the following reasons, we
vacate Gibson’s conviction and sentence and remand the matter to the trial
court for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On February 22, 2018, Gibson was charged by bill of indictment with
the second-degree murder of Larry Davis,1 a violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1.
Gibson entered a plea of not guilty. On June 28, 2019, Gibson filed a
motion to require a unanimous jury verdict; the State filed an objection to
this motion. The motion was denied by the trial court on July 24, 2019. A
jury trial was held, and on September 30, 2019, the jury found Gibson guilty
of the responsive verdict of manslaughter, a violation of La. R.S. 14:31. The
jury was polled; 11 of 12 jurors concurred in the guilty verdict, resulting in a
non-unanimous verdict.
A motion for new trial filed by Gibson on October 18, 2019, was
denied by the trial court on October 28, 2019. On that same date, and
without a waiver of delay, the trial court sentenced Gibson to 35 years at
hard labor. Having been advised of his appeal rights and post-conviction
relief time limits, Gibson filed the instant appeal.
1 The offense occurred on January 3, 2018. DISCUSSION
The sole issue on appeal is the non-unanimous verdict. Gibson asked
this Court to set aside his conviction and sentence and remand his case for
new trial. The State, in its brief, concurred.
In the recent decision of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___, 140 S. Ct.
1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 (2020), the United States Supreme Court held that
the right to a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
incorporated against the states by way of the Fourteenth Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution, requires a unanimous verdict to convict a defendant of the
same offense. The Ramos court further indicated that its ruling may require
retrial of those defendants convicted of felonies by non-unanimous verdicts
whose cases are still pending on direct appeal. Ramos, 140 S. Ct. at 1406.
As the verdict in this case was not unanimous, we hereby vacate the
conviction and sentence, and the case is remanded to the trial court for
further proceedings.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, Defendant Bryan S. Gibson’s
conviction and sentence are vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial
court.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Louisiana v. Bryan S. Gibson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-bryan-s-gibson-lactapp-2021.