State Of Louisiana v. Arlen J. Brown

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 26, 2021
Docket2021KW0347
StatusUnknown

This text of State Of Louisiana v. Arlen J. Brown (State Of Louisiana v. Arlen J. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Of Louisiana v. Arlen J. Brown, (La. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0347

VERSUS

ARLEN J. BROWN APRIL 26, 2021

In Re: Arlen J. Brown, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No.

10949.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, McCLENDON, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. In Ramos v. Louisiana, _ U. S. , _, 140 S. Ct. 1390, 1397, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 ( 2020), the United States

Supreme Court held, " the Sixth Amendment' s unanimity requirement applies to state and federal criminal trials equally." However,

the Court declined to address whether its holding applied

retroactively to cases on collateral review. The Court

specifically observed that the question of "[ w] hether the right

to jury unanimity applies to cases on collateral review is a

question for a future case where the parties will have a chance

to brief the issue and we will benefit from their adversarial

presentation." See Ramos, _ U. S. at , 140 S. Ct. at 1407. The question of whether Ramos must apply retroactively to cases

on federal collateral review is currently pending before the Court. Edwards v. Vannoy, _ U. S. F 140 S. Ct. 2737, 206 L. Ed. 2d 917 ( 2020). Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court has declined to definitively rule on whether Ramos should apply on

collateral review in state court proceedings pending a decision in Edwards. See State v. Gipson, 2019- 01815 ( La. 6/ 3/ 20), 296 So. 3d 1051, 1052 ( Johnson, C. J., dissenting to point out that

she disagreed with the majority' s decision to defer ruling until the United States Supreme Court mandates action). Therefore, we

are constrained to deny relief at this time. However, our

decision does not preclude relator from reurging the issue in the district court if warranted by the decision of the higher court( s).

JMG PMC WIL

DEPUTY C ERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramos v. Louisiana
140 S. Ct. 1390 (Supreme Court, 2020)
Edwards v. Vannoy
140 S. Ct. 2737 (Supreme Court, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Of Louisiana v. Arlen J. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-v-arlen-j-brown-lactapp-2021.