State Of Louisiana In The Interest Of J.J.
This text of State Of Louisiana In The Interest Of J.J. (State Of Louisiana In The Interest Of J.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE NO. 2024 KW 0628 INTEREST OF J. J. PAGE 1 OF 2
FEBRUARY 14, 2025
In Re: J. J., applying for supervisory writs, Juvenile Court, Parish of Ascension, No. J- 24097.
BEFORE: WOLFE, MILLER, AND GREENE, Ji.
WRIT GRANTED. If a child is not continued in custody, the adjudication hearing shall commence within ninety days of the appearance to answer the petition. If the hearing has not been commenced timely, upon motion of the child, the court
shall release a child continued in custody and shall dismiss the petition. La. Ch. Code art. 877 ( B) & ( C) . In the instant case, the child was not in continued but custody, answered the petition on February 8, 2024. An adjudication hearing was not commenced within ninety days, and on May 22, 2024, J. J. filed an objection to the hearing and a motion for dismissal under Article 877. After a hearing on June 5, 2024, the juvenile court denied the motion and stayed future proceedings. After consideration of the facts and circumstances presented in this the case, state failed to
meet its burden to make a showing of good cause on the record and to obtain an extension before the time period expired. See State in the Interest of J. M., 2013- 2573 ( La. 12/ 9/ 14), 156 So. 3d 1161; see also State in the Interest of R. W., 2016- 1187 ( La. App. 4th Cir. 3/ 2/ 17), 213 So. 3d 13, writ denied, 228 So. 3d 1225, 2017- 0411 ( La. 10/ 27/ 17). Additionally, there was no showing that in any continuances this matter
were joint motions made by the state and the child. See State in the Interest of C. C. H., 2021- 19 ( La. App. 3rd Cir. 5/ 5/ 21), 319 So. 3d 940. Moreover, it is noted that the state
previously was ordered by this court to file a response in this matter, but failed to do Thus, so. because the time limitations in Article 877 are the juvenile mandatory, court' s ruling denying J. J.' s motion to dismiss is reversed, and the delinquency petition filed against J. J. is dismissed because he was not timely adjudicated.
SMM HG
Wolfe, J., dissents. I would issue an order directing the state to respond to our previous order. On October 7, 2024, this court issued an interim order, the wherein State of Louisiana, through Ricky L. Babin, District Attorney, or his designated assistant, was ordered to file a response on or before November 5, 2024, addressing the merits of J- J.' s claims urged in his writ application filed with this court. However, the state failed to respond as ordered. Thus, I would have ordered the state to file a response to the merits of the claims raised in J- J.' s writ NO. 2024 KW 0628
PAGE 2 OF 2
application, and in the event the state again failed to comply with this court' s order, I would have ordered District Attorney Ricky L. Babin to appear before this court to show cause why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with this court' s order.
URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Y CLERK OF LOUR FOR THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Of Louisiana In The Interest Of J.J., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-louisiana-in-the-interest-of-jj-lactapp-2025.