State of Kan., ex rel. Hayden v. United States
This text of 953 F.2d 1392 (State of Kan., ex rel. Hayden v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
953 F.2d 1392
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
STATE OF KANSAS, ex rel. Mike HAYDEN, Governor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Federal Emergency Management
Agency, a Federal Government Agency; Robert H.
Morris, Acting Director of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-3362.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Jan. 23, 1992.
Before SEYMOUR and STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and OWEN,* District Judge.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The State of Kansas appeals from an order of the district court dismissing this action against the United States, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Robert H. Morris. We have carefully reviewed the state's contentions, and we are not persuaded that the district court committed reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
The Honorable Richard Owen, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
953 F.2d 1392, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9246, 1992 WL 11315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-kan-ex-rel-hayden-v-united-states-ca10-1992.