State of Iowa v. Torrenzo Michael Green

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedJune 5, 2019
Docket18-1057
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Torrenzo Michael Green (State of Iowa v. Torrenzo Michael Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Torrenzo Michael Green, (iowactapp 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-1057 Filed June 5, 2019

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

TORRENZO MICHAEL GREEN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Lars G. Anderson

(guilty plea) and Mary E. Chicchelly (sentencing), Judges.

Torrenzo Green appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with

intent to deliver. AFFIRMED.

Jeffrey L. Powell of Powell & McCullough, PLC, Coralville, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Considered by Potterfield, P.J., Doyle, J., and Mahan, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019). 2

MAHAN, Senior Judge.

Torrenzo Green pled guilty to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver,

in violation of Iowa Code section 124.401(1)(d) (2017). As part of Green’s plea

deal, the State agreed to dismiss a related class “D” felony charge and recommend

Green receive a suspended sentence. Following a hearing, the district court

accepted his plea, entered judgment, and imposed sentence.

Green now appeals, claiming his trial counsel was ineffective for allowing

him to plead guilty without “fully investigat[ing] the facts surrounding Green’s

charges” and “fully ascertain[ing his] mental competence to execute an effective

plea of guilty.” The record before us lacks any basis to evaluate Green’s claim.

Therefore, we affirm his conviction and preserve his ineffective-assistance claim

for possible postconviction-relief proceedings. See State v. Harris, 919 N.W.2d

753, 754 (Iowa 2018) (“If the record is insufficient to allow for a review on direct

appeal, we do not reach the issue on direct appeal and allow the defendant to raise

the claim in a separate postconviction-relief action.”).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Iowa v. Anthony Antoine Harris
919 N.W.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Torrenzo Michael Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-torrenzo-michael-green-iowactapp-2019.