State of Iowa v. Thaddeus Dylan Usher
This text of State of Iowa v. Thaddeus Dylan Usher (State of Iowa v. Thaddeus Dylan Usher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 24-0250 Filed March 5, 2025
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
THADDEUS DYLAN USHER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clayton County, Laura Parrish,
Judge.
Thaddeus Dylan Usher appeals the sentence imposed by the district court
after pleading guilty to stalking and first-degree harassment. APPEAL
DISMISSED.
Chris Raker of Alliance Law Office, P.C., East Dubuque, Illinois, for
appellant.
Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Katherine Wenman, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Considered by Schumacher, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ. 2
CHICCHELLY, Judge.
From September 2022 to April 2023, Usher and the victim were in a
romantic relationship. According to the minutes of testimony, after their separation
in April until June 2023, Usher harassed the victim, calling her sometimes
hundreds of times per day. Usher left the victim detailed voicemails, in which he
threatened to “rape [her] ass,” “break bones,” and “snap [her] fucking neck.” Usher
made similar threats against the victim’s partner and her children, stating he would
“have fun” with them. In June 2023, the victim drove to Usher’s residence at his
request. Once there, Usher did not permit the victim to leave. After Usher raped
her twice, the victim managed to escape and eventually report the incidents to law
enforcement.
The State charged Usher with count I, third-degree sexual abuse; count II,
stalking, a class “D” felony; count III, first-degree harassment; and count IV, false
imprisonment. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Usher pled guilty to a
lesser-included stalking charge under count II and count III. The court accepted
his plea and dismissed counts I and IV.
At the sentencing hearing, both the State and Usher requested an
indeterminate term of incarceration not to exceed two years on each count,
suspension of both, and placement on probation. The court accepted the
recommendation and sentenced Usher as requested. Usher appeals.
A defendant who pleads guilty must show “good cause” to appeal. See
Iowa Code § 814.6(1)(a)(3) (2023). While good cause may be established by
appealing the sentence rather than the plea itself, see generally State v. Damme,
944 N.W.2d 98, 105 (Iowa 2020), we must dismiss appeals “when the sentence 3
imposed is . . . the agreed-upon sentence under the plea agreement,” State v.
Estabrook, No. 22-1118, 2023 WL 2671954, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2023).
First, Usher fails to make a “good cause” argument, even though it is his burden
to establish good cause exists. Damme, 944 N.W.2d at 104; cf. State v. Davis,
971 N.W.2d 546, 554 (Iowa 2022) (acknowledging that a defendant “should have
discussed section 814.6(1)(a)(3)” in his brief “to show he met the good-cause
requirement,” but still finding good cause when the issue raised is one for which
good cause has been found to exist). Second, Usher not only requested but
actually received the two-year suspended sentence the court imposed.
Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal for lack of good cause. See Estabrook,
2021 WL 2671954, at *1 (collecting cases where dismissal was required for failure
to establish good cause).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. Thaddeus Dylan Usher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-thaddeus-dylan-usher-iowactapp-2025.