State of Iowa v. Rodney L. Hanneman
This text of State of Iowa v. Rodney L. Hanneman (State of Iowa v. Rodney L. Hanneman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 17–1147
Scott County No. FECR383233
ORDER
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
RODNEY L. HANNEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
The court, being evenly divided, declares this case affirmed by operation of law. See Iowa Code § 602.4107 (2017). Waterman, Mansfield, and Christensen, JJ., would affirm the judgment of the district court; Cady, C.J., and Wiggins and Appel, J., would reverse the judgment of the district court. See State v. Effler, 769 N.W.2d 880, 884 (Iowa 2009) (“[W]hen the supreme court is equally divided on an issue upon which the district court and court of appeals differ, the decision of the district court is affirmed by operation of law.”). Copies to:
Mark Smith State Appellate Defender Martha Lucey Assistant Appellate Defender Lucas State Office Building Des Moines, IA 50319–0106
Kevin Cmelik Martha Trout Assistant Attorneys General Criminal Appeals Division Hoover State Office Building, 2nd Floor Des Moines, IA 50319–0106
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. Rodney L. Hanneman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-rodney-l-hanneman-iowa-2019.