State of Iowa v. Randy Dean Miles Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedApril 14, 2021
Docket19-1157
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Randy Dean Miles Jr. (State of Iowa v. Randy Dean Miles Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Randy Dean Miles Jr., (iowactapp 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 19-1157 Filed April 14, 2021

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

RANDY DEAN MILES JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. Farrell,

Judge.

Randy Miles appeals the order approving the Polk County Sheriff’s claim

for reimbursement of administrative costs and room and board. REVERSED AND

JUDGMENT VACATED IN PART.

Erin M. Carr of Carr Law Firm, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel Mullins, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J., Tabor, J., and Carr, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order under Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2021). 2

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Randy Miles was arrested and jailed in November 2017 on charges of first-

degree murder (a class “A” felony) and first-degree arson (a class “B” felony).

Bond was set at $1,000,000 cash only for each charge. Miles had no job and no

money. In November 2018, Miles reported to the court the parties were working

through plea negotiations. In February 2019, he reported to the court the parties

reached a plea agreement. The plea hearing took place in March 2019. Miles

agreed to plead guilty to reduced charges of involuntary manslaughter (a class “D”

felony) and fleeing the state to avoid prosecution for a felony (a class “D” felony),

with habitual offender sentencing enhancements. The court accepted his guilty

plea and later sentenced Miles to consecutive fifteen-year terms of imprisonment

and ordered him to serve at least one-half. He was also ordered to pay $150,000

in restitution. See Iowa Code § 910.3B(1) (2017) (court shall order offender who

causes the death of victim to pay $150,000 in restitution to victim’s estate or heirs).

After sentencing, the State moved to amend the sentencing order to include

amounts of restitution that were unavailable at the time of sentencing. Included

with these motions was the Polk County Sheriff’s claim for reimbursement of

administrative costs and room and board related to Miles’s stay in the Polk County

Jail from November 6, 2017 to April 2, 2019. See Iowa Code § 356.7(1), (2)(f),

(2)(g) (2019) (allowing the county sheriff to charge a person convicted of a criminal

offense for room and board and administrative costs while in the sheriff’s custody

and to file a claim with the district court for that amount). The sheriff’s claim sought 3

reimbursement for a $75 administrative fee and the 512 days 1 of room and board

at a rate of $60 per day, for a total claim of $30,795. After a hearing, the court

ordered Miles to reimburse the sheriff in the full amount as a civil judgment, rather

than including it in Miles’s plan of restitution. See State v. Abrahamson, 696

N.W.2d 589, 593 (Iowa 2005) (“Under section 356.7(3), a court-approved claim for

room and board may be enforced in two ways: as a judgment in the traditional

sense, under Iowa Code chapter 626, or as part of a restitution plan under chapter

910.”).

On appeal, Miles challenges the amount of jail costs and fees. He argues

the State failed to provide evidence to support the amount and the amount is

unconstitutionally excessive. We review his challenge to the amount of costs and

fees for correction of errors at law, determining whether substantial evidence

supports the court’s findings. See State v. Gross, 935 N.W.2d 695, 698 (Iowa

2019).

Miles argues that the State failed to provide evidentiary support for the

amount of jail fees. So we must first determine whether the court’s findings lack

the support of substantial evidence. Id. A representative of the sheriff’s office was

not present at the hearing. The court commented to the prosecutor that defense

counsel had asked the sheriff to come in to “verify how they make the

determination to the daily rate.” The court asked the prosecutor, “And you don’t

have any evidence to offer as to that, I assume, today?” The prosecutor

responded, “I do not.” In its written order, the court noted the State presented no

1 Miles spent 513 days in the Polk County Jail, but Miles received a $60 credit for the first day of room and board. 4

evidence specifically on the calculations of the jail fees beyond what was in the

court file—the claim form. The court acknowledged the State did not provide

evidence to show how the sheriff calculated the $60 room and board daily rate.

The court stated it took judicial notice that the Polk County Sheriff charges that

same rate in each case in which it makes a claim. In its conclusions of law, the

court again stated the State presented no evidence to show exactly how it

calculated its $60 daily rate. So the court relied on an appellate opinion that

affirmed a $50 daily rate where evidence presented in that case showed other

surrounding jails were charging $60 to $70 per day. State v. Abrahamson, 696

N.W.2d 598, 591 (Iowa 2005). The district court found, “The present-day $60.00

rate charged by the Polk County Sheriff is well within a range of reasonableness

in light of the record in Abrahamson.”2 But reasonableness is not the question

here. Substantial evidence must support the claim, not reasonableness. The

prosecutor presented no evidence to support the sheriff’s room and board claim

other than the claim itself. And no evidence was presented about the actual

administrative costs relating to Miles’s arrest and booking. See Iowa Code

§ 356.7(1) (emphasis added). We conclude that the district court’s judgment lacks

substantial evidentiary support. We therefore reverse, and we vacate that portion

2 We are aware of many cases that have approved similar daily rates. See, e.g., State v. Miller, No. 20-0576, 2021 WL 210981, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2021) ($50 per day); State v. Boyer, No. 18-1892, 2020 WL 2108129, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2020) ($60 per day); State v. Boruch, No. 14-1757, 2016 WL 4801325, at *4 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2016) ($60 per day); State v. Winters, No. 03-1787, 2004 WL 1836211, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. July 28, 2004) ($46.73 per day). But the amount of the daily rate was not challenged in these cases. 5

of the judgment ordering repayment of jail fees and administrative costs in the

amount of $30,795.00.

In view of our disposition, we need not decide Miles’s claim that the

assessment of room and board charges amount to an excessive fine, in violation

of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 17

of the Iowa Constitution.

REVERSED AND JUDGMENT VACATED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Winters
690 N.W.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 2004)
State v. Abrahamson
696 N.W.2d 589 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Randy Dean Miles Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-randy-dean-miles-jr-iowactapp-2021.