State of Iowa v. Randall James Maresch
This text of State of Iowa v. Randall James Maresch (State of Iowa v. Randall James Maresch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 18-1296 Filed May 15, 2019
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
RANDALL JAMES MARESCH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Mark J.
Eveloff, Judge.
Following a guilty plea, Randall Maresch appeals his sentence.
SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, (until withdrawal) and Brenda J.
Gohr, Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Israel Kodiaga, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and Tabor, JJ. 2
VAITHESWARAN, Presiding Judge.
Randall Maresch pled guilty to willful injury causing serious injury, in
violation of Iowa Code section 708.4 (2017). The district court sentenced him to
prison and imposed and suspended a $1000 fine. The court also ordered various
classes of restitution, including restitution for “court costs in an amount to be
assessed by the Clerk of Court” and restitution for “court-appointed attorney fees.”
The sentencing order further stated:
All financial obligations are due immediately. After 30 days any unpaid debt will be considered delinquent. Any delinquent debt shall be referred to the private collection agency acting on behalf of the Iowa Judicial Branch. For current financial information check www.iowacourts.state.ia.us. Accruing costs may be added at a later date.
On appeal, Maresch contends the district court erred in “assessing financial
obligations to [him] without first making a constitutionally mandated determination
of his reasonable ability to pay.”
The supreme court recently addressed the proper procedure for ordering
restitution and for considering a defendant’s reasonable ability to pay restitution.
See State v. Albright, 925 N.W.2d 144, 158–61 (Iowa 2019). We summarized the
opinion in State v. Northern, No. 18-1634, 2019 WL _____, at * __ (Iowa Ct. App.
May 15, 2019) filed on this date. In short, the court stated, “Until the court issues
the final restitution order, the court is not required to consider the offender’s
reasonable ability to pay.” Albright, 925 N.W.2d at 160–61. The court held, “Once
the court has all the items of restitution before it, then and only then shall the court
make an assessment as to the offender’s reasonable ability to pay.” Id. at 162. 3
In the wake of Albright, we vacate that portion of the sentencing order
imposing an obligation to immediately pay court costs and court-appointed
attorney fees. Imposition of those restitution items shall await the filing of a final
restitution order and a subsequent determination of Maresch’s reasonable ability
to pay.
SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. Randall James Maresch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-randall-james-maresch-iowactapp-2019.