State of Iowa v. Mark McMahon

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedMarch 6, 2019
Docket18-1773
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Mark McMahon (State of Iowa v. Mark McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Mark McMahon, (iowactapp 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-1773 Filed March 6, 2019

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MARK MCMAHON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Boone County, Stephen A. Owen,

District Associate Judge.

Mark McMahon appeals following his guilty plea to failure to comply with

sex offender registry requirements, first offense. AFFIRMED.

Ashley M. Sparks of Cooper, Goedicke, Reimer & Reese, P.C., West Des

Moines, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Bridget A. Chambers, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, C.J., Vaitheswaran, J., and Blane, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2019). 2

VAITHESWARAN, Judge.

The State charged Mark McMahon with failure to comply with sex offender

registry requirements, first offense, an aggravated misdemeanor. McMahon

entered a written plea of guilty to the charge. The district court accepted the plea

by order. The court later adjudged him guilty and imposed a prison term not

exceeding two years.

One day after sentence was imposed McMahon’s attorney moved to

withdraw on the ground McMahon was dissatisfied with his service. McMahon

signed the motion and, next to his signature, wrote “did not understand the plea

deal offered.” He later filed a notice of appeal.

On appeal, McMahon argues his attorney was ineffective in failing to file a

motion in arrest of judgment on the ground that his plea “was not intelligently and

voluntarily made.” We find the record inadequate to resolve the claim.

Accordingly, we preserve it for postconviction relief. See State v. McNeal, 867

N.W.2d 91, 105 (Iowa 2015).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Iowa v. Clifford Lynn McNeal
867 N.W.2d 91 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Mark McMahon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-mark-mcmahon-iowactapp-2019.