State of Iowa v. Luke Patrick Nelson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedNovember 13, 2014
Docket14-0214
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Luke Patrick Nelson (State of Iowa v. Luke Patrick Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Luke Patrick Nelson, (iowactapp 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0214 Filed November 13, 2014

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LUKE PATRICK NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, Kim M. Riley,

District Associate Judge.

Luke Nelson appeals following his plea of guilty to aggravated assault.

AFFIRMED.

Darrell G. Meyer, Marshalltown, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Heather Ann Mapes, Assistant

Attorney General, Jennifer Miller, County Attorney, and Paul Crawford, Assistant

County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., and Vaitheswaran and Potterfield, JJ. 2

POTTERFIELD, J.

Luke Nelson appeals following his plea of guilty to aggravated assault. He

contends his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to fully and accurately advise

him of his right to file a motion in arrest of judgment, in advising him to plead

guilty, and in not personally appearing at sentencing or offering evidence on the

defendant’s behalf.

“Ordinarily, we do not decide ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on

direct appeal.” State v. Tate, 710 N.W.2d 237, 240 (Iowa 2006). Only where the

record is adequate to evaluate the claim will we resolve an ineffectiveness claim

on direct appeal. Id. We prefer to reserve such claims for development of the

record and to allow trial counsel to defend against the charge. Id. If the record is

inadequate to address the claim on direct appeal, we must preserve the claim for

a postconviction-relief proceeding, regardless of the potential viability of the

claim. State v. Johnson, 784 N.W.2d 192, 198 (Iowa 2010). Here, we preserve

the claims for possible postconviction proceedings, finding the record inadequate

to address them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tate
710 N.W.2d 237 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2006)
State v. Johnson
784 N.W.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Luke Patrick Nelson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-luke-patrick-nelson-iowactapp-2014.