State of Iowa v. Justin Lamont Wright

Court of Appeals of Iowa·Decided January 9, 2025·No. 23-0968·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 23-0968

Filed January 9, 2025

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JUSTIN LAMONT WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Tamara Roberts, Judge.

Justin Lamont Wright appeals his conviction for first-degree murder.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Mark C. Meyer, Iowa City, for appellant.

Brenna Bird, Attorney General, and Joseph D. Ferrentino, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Schumacher, P.J., and Badding and Chicchelly, JJ.

CHICCHELLY, Judge.

Justin Lamont Wright appeals his conviction for first-degree murder.

Because we lack authority to hear this appeal, we must dismiss.

The State charged Wright with first-degree murder after he shot his girlfriend. A jury convicted him as charged, and Wright appeals.

Wright attempts to put forth an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim thinly disguised as a “structural error” argument. But we are not permitted to decide such claims on direct appeal. See Iowa Code § 814.7 (2023) (requiring defendants claiming ineffective assistance to apply for postconviction relief under chapter 822); State v. Treptow, 960 N.W.2d 98, 110 (Iowa 2021) (concluding appellate courts have “no authority to decide a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal”). Because we cannot “provide [Wright] with relief,” we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal and must dismiss. Treptow, 960 N.W.2d at 110.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Iowa v. Justin Lamont Wright, (iowactapp 2025).

State of Iowa v. Justin Lamont Wright (State of Iowa v. Justin Lamont Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 814.7
Iowa § 814.7