State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedMarch 11, 2015
Docket13-1906
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson (State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson, (iowactapp 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 13-1906 Filed March 11, 2015

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JOSHUA SCOTT PEARSON, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marion County, Martha L. Mertz,

Judge.

Joshua Pearson appeals his sentence for sexual abuse in the third

degree. AFFIRMED.

William L. Bushell of Bushell Law Firm, Des Moines, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney

General, and Edward W. Bull, Marion County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Mullins, P.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ. 2

BOWER, J.

Joshua Pearson appeals from the district court’s resentencing of his

conviction for two counts of sexual abuse in the third degree. Iowa Code

§ 709.4(2)(c)(4) (2011). Pearson claims the district court acted outside the scope

of an appellate decision directing it to amend Pearson’s judgment, and therefore

acted illegally. We find the district court properly resentenced Pearson and affirm

by memorandum opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(c).

We initially dealt with this case in 2013, and we incorporate the

background facts from that case:

On April 17, 2012, Pearson pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual abuse in the third degree, in violation of Iowa Code section 709.4(2)(c)(4). He was charged with committing a sex act with a fifteen-year-old female and there was a written stipulation confirming the female’s birth date and Pearson’s birth date. Pearson appeared for sentencing on June 8, 2012. The sentencing court recognized the victim was a fifteen-year-old girl. In a judgment and sentence order filed on June 8, 2012, the court entered judgment against Pearson for two counts of violating Iowa Code section 709.4(2)(b), which section criminalizes a sex act with a twelve or thirteen year old. Iowa Code section 709.4(2)(c)(4) is not a forcible felony. See Iowa Code § 702.11(2)(c). Iowa Code section 709.4(2)(b) is a forcible felony. Pearson appealed on June 13, 2012.

State v. Pearson, No. 13-1311, 2013 WL 5291941 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 18,

2013). After determining the case should be remanded, we discussed whether

the district court should be ordered to correct a mistake at law or enter an order

nunc pro tunc to correct a clerical error. Id. at *1. We concluded the case should

be vacated, and we remanded to the district court to “allow the district court to

amend the judgment.” Id. at *3. On remand, the district court understood our

opinion to mean it should resentence Pearson. 3

In our previous opinion, we relied on State v. Garrett, where the defendant

was charged with criminal trespass and the elements of trespass were properly

submitted to the jury, but the verdict form was labeled criminal mischief. 516

N.W. 2d 892, 894 (Iowa 1994). The Iowa Supreme Court vacated and remanded

for resentencing due to the mistakenly labeled verdict form. Id.

We find the district court properly resentenced Pearson and affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Garrett
516 N.W.2d 892 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-joshua-scott-pearson-iowactapp-2015.