State of Iowa v. James David Harwood Jr.
This text of State of Iowa v. James David Harwood Jr. (State of Iowa v. James David Harwood Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 20-0176 Filed September 23, 2020
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JAMES DAVID HARWOOD JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Mahaska County, Crystal S. Cronk,
Judge.
James Harwood Jr. appeals from his conviction and sentence for sexual
abuse in the third degree, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Steven E. Goodlow of Goodlow Law Firm, Albia, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Bridget A. Chambers, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
Considered by Bower, C.J., and May and Ahlers, JJ. 2
AHLERS, Judge.
In return for dismissal of other charges, James Harwood Jr. pleaded guilty
to sexual abuse in the third degree, a class “C” felony, and was sentenced
accordingly. He appeals, claiming his counsel was ineffective in allowing him to
plead guilty without properly investigating or raising an issue as to Harwood’s
mental capacity to intelligently enter a plea. The State asserts we do not have
jurisdiction to address ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims on direct appeal
due to the 2019 amendments to Iowa Code section 814.7 (2019).
During the 2019 session of the Iowa legislature, Iowa Code section 814.7
was amended to read as follows:
An ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a criminal case shall be determined by filing an application for postconviction relief pursuant to chapter 822. The claim need not be raised on direct appeal from criminal proceedings in order to preserve the claim for postconviction relief purposes, and the claim shall not be decided on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings.
2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140, § 31. This amendment took effect July 1, 2019, and has
been interpreted to apply to cases in which judgment and sentence is entered after
the effective date. See State v. Macke, 933 N.W.2d 226, 228 (Iowa 2019) (holding
Iowa Code section 814.7, as amended, “do[es] not apply to a direct appeal from a
judgment and sentence entered before July 1, 2019”).
In this case, the crime was committed, the trial information was filed, the
guilty plea was entered, and sentence was imposed after July 1, 2019. Therefore,
the amended version of section 814.7 cited above applies. By operation of that
statute, we lack jurisdiction to hear Harwood’s appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. James David Harwood Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-james-david-harwood-jr-iowactapp-2020.