State of Iowa v. David M. Boggs

Court of Appeals of Iowa·Decided February 16, 2022·No. 20-0323·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 20-0323

Filed February 16, 2022

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DAVID M. BOGGS, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cass County, Jeffrey L. Larson, Judge.

David Boggs appeals an order denying his motion to extinguish his restitution obligation. AFFIRMED.

Anne M. Rohling of Rohling Law, PLLC, Council Bluffs, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Darrel Mullins, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., May, J., and Vogel, S.J.* *Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2022).

MAY, Judge.

David Boggs appeals an order denying his motion to extinguish his restitution obligation. His claim in this appeal is identical to the claim he raised in a prior appeal, Boggs v. State, No. 20-0311, 2021 WL 4592776, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021), in which we affirmed the district court.1 We see no reason to treat this appeal differently. So we affirm without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26(1)(d)(e).

AFFIRMED.

1The argument section of Boggs’s brief in his current appeal is identical to that in his brief for Boggs, 2021 WL 4592776, at *1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Iowa v. David M. Boggs, (iowactapp 2022).

State of Iowa v. David M. Boggs (State of Iowa v. David M. Boggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.