State of Iowa v. David Kelly Taylor

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedOctober 1, 2014
Docket14-0022
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. David Kelly Taylor (State of Iowa v. David Kelly Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. David Kelly Taylor, (iowactapp 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0022 Filed October 1, 2014

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DAVID KELLY TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Eliza J. Ovrom,

Judge.

David Taylor appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following his

guilty plea to the charge of possession of methamphetamine, second offense.

AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Maria Ruhtenberg,

Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Alexandra Link, Assistant Attorney

General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and Andrea Petrovich, Assistant

County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Bower, JJ. 2

DANILSON, C.J.

David Taylor appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following his

guilty plea to the charge of possession of methamphetamine, second offense.

He contends his plea counsel was ineffective in failing to move to suppress the

evidence found in his vehicle. The only record here is the minutes of testimony.

Taylor’s claim challenges the constitutional validity of the search of his vehicle,

which cannot be addressed properly without additional facts and perhaps input

from plea counsel. Because the record is inadequate to address the claim, we

preserve it for possible postconviction proceedings. See State v. Carroll, 767

N.W.2d 638, 645 (Iowa 2009); see also State v. Clay, 824 N.W.2d 488, 494

(Iowa 2012) (“We ordinarily preserve [ineffectiveness] claims for postconviction

relief proceedings.”). We affirm the conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carroll
767 N.W.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2009)
State of Iowa v. Allen Bradley Clay
824 N.W.2d 488 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. David Kelly Taylor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-david-kelly-taylor-iowactapp-2014.