State of Iowa v. Daniel Lee Shaw
This text of State of Iowa v. Daniel Lee Shaw (State of Iowa v. Daniel Lee Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 18-0005 Filed February 6, 2019
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
DANIEL LEE SHAW, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, Jennifer S.
Bailey, District Associate Judge.
Daniel Shaw appeals his conviction for carrying weapons. AFFIRMED.
Trent A. Henkelvig of Henkelvig Law, Danville, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Genevieve Reinkoester, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
Considered by Vogel, C.J., and Vaitheswaran and McDonald, JJ. 2
VAITHESWARAN, Judge.
Daniel Shaw appeals his judgment and sentence for carrying weapons, in
violation of Iowa Code section 724.4(1) (2017). Shaw contends his trial attorney
was ineffective in “failing to object to Iowa Code chapter 724 as unconstitutional
under the 2nd amendment [to the United States Constitution] in light of [District of
Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)].” The State preliminarily responds that
Shaw waived the issue by failing to “make any argument regarding how his trial
counsel breached a duty [and] how this breach prejudiced him, and” by failing “to
cite any authority in support of these claims.”
The Iowa Supreme Court recently held, “If the development of the
ineffective-assistance claim in the appellate brief [is] insufficient to allow its
consideration, the court of appeals should not consider the claim, but it should not
outright reject it.” State v. Harris, 919 N.W.2d 753, 754 (Iowa 2018). The court
stated the defendant could “bring a separate postconviction-relief action based on
his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.” Id.
Pursuant to Harris, we affirm Shaw’s judgment and sentence without
prejudice to his right to raise his ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim in a
postconviction-relief application.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. Daniel Lee Shaw, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-daniel-lee-shaw-iowactapp-2019.