State of Iowa v. Cordarrel Dontya Smith
This text of State of Iowa v. Cordarrel Dontya Smith (State of Iowa v. Cordarrel Dontya Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 14-0812 Filed January 13, 2016
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
CORDARREL DONTYA SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Bradley J.
Harris, Judge.
The defendant appeals from the district court’s denial of his motions to
dismiss for violation of the speedy indictment rule. REVERSED AND
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Zorana Wortham-White of Wortham-White Law Office, Waterloo, for
appellant Smith.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Alexandra Link, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Tabor, JJ. 2
DANILSON, Chief Judge.
Our original opinion in this case was vacated when we granted Smith’s
petition for rehearing. See Iowa R. App. P. 6.1204(5). Smith’s case is a
companion case to State v. Washington, No. 14-0792, 2015 WL ___ (Iowa Ct.
App. Nov. 25, 2015). Smith, as his co-defendant Washington did, appeals from
the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss, claiming the State violated the
speedy indictment rule. After the State filed a second trial information on May
22, 2014, both Smith and Washington again filed motions to dismiss on the same
grounds, and the motions were denied. But only Smith filed a second application
for discretionary review. Our supreme court granted both of Smith’s applications,
consolidated the appeals, and transferred them to us.
For the same reasons enumerated in Washington, Smith was arrested for
speedy indictment purposes on June 10, 2012, and any trial informations filed
more than forty-five days after that date were untimely. See Iowa R. Crim. P.
2.33(2)(a). Accordingly, we find the district court erred in denying Smith’s
motions to dismiss. We reverse the district court’s rulings and remand for entry
of dismissal of the charges
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. Cordarrel Dontya Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-cordarrel-dontya-smith-iowactapp-2016.