State of Iowa v. Christopher James Beardshear

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedJanuary 23, 2019
Docket18-0608
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Christopher James Beardshear (State of Iowa v. Christopher James Beardshear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Christopher James Beardshear, (iowactapp 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 18-0608 Filed January 23, 2019

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CHRISTOPHER JAMES BEARDSHEAR, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Washington County, Daniel P.

Kitchen, District Associate Judge.

Christopher Beardshear appeals his conviction for operating while

intoxicated, first offense. AFFIRMED.

Shawn C. McCullough of Powell and McCullough, PLC, Coralville, for

appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Louis S. Sloven, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, C.J., and Vaitheswaran and McDonald, JJ. 2

VOGEL, Chief Judge.

Christopher Beardshear appeals his conviction for operating while

intoxicated, first offense. On March 1, 2018, he submitted a written plea of guilty

to the charge and waived his right to a personal appearance. On the plea,

Beardshear acknowledged, “I am in good health. I am not now under the influence

of any stimulant, drugs or alcohol. I have no physical or mental defects that prevent

me from understanding the charge(s) or proceedings.” On March 6, the district

court entered judgment based on his written plea.

He now appeals, asserting his trial counsel was ineffective for allowing him

to plead guilty when he was under that influence of medication that prevented him

from knowingly and voluntarily entering a plea. The record before us lacks any

basis to evaluate his claim. Therefore, we affirm his conviction and preserve his

ineffective-assistance claim for possible postconviction proceedings. See State v.

Coil, 264 N.W.2d 293, 296 (Iowa 1978) (“Even a lawyer is entitled to his [or her]

day in court, especially when his [or her] professional reputation is impugned.”).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coil
264 N.W.2d 293 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Christopher James Beardshear, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-christopher-james-beardshear-iowactapp-2019.