State of Iowa v. Bradley W. Love

CourtCourt of Appeals of Iowa
DecidedAugust 17, 2016
Docket15-1042
StatusPublished

This text of State of Iowa v. Bradley W. Love (State of Iowa v. Bradley W. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Iowa v. Bradley W. Love, (iowactapp 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 15-1042 Filed August 17, 2016

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

BRADLEY W. LOVE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Henry County, John M. Wright,

Judge.

Defendant challenges the constitutionality of his sentence. AFFIRMED.

Jeffrey L. Powell of The Law Office of Jeffrey L. Powell, Washington, for

appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Considered by Vogel, P.J., Bower, J., and Blane, S.J.*

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2015). 2

BLANE, Senior Judge.

In 1993, Bradley Love pled guilty to one count of second-degree murder,

one count of first-degree burglary, and two counts of attempted murder, which

were committed on December 25, 1992, when he was seventeen years old. He

was sentenced to 125 years in prison, with a twenty-year mandatory minimum.

On September 23, 2013, Love filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence,

following recent cases by the United States Supreme Court and Iowa Supreme

Court reconsidering juvenile sentencing guidelines. See generally Miller v.

Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012); State v. Ragland, 836 N.W.2d 107 (Iowa

2013); State v. Pearson, 836 N.W.2d 88 (Iowa 2013); State v. Null, 836 N.W.2d

41 (Iowa 2013).

On March 5, 2015, the district court held a resentencing hearing. By that

date, our supreme court had decided State v. Lyle, 854 N.W.2d 378, 400 (Iowa

2014), which invalidated mandatory minimums for juvenile offenders. As a result,

the district court corrected Love’s sentence by eliminating the mandatory

minimum. The district court also modified the sentence, reducing it to a term of

100 years with the immediate chance for parole. Love now appeals.

On appeal, Love claims a term of 100 years for crimes committed as a

juvenile is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States

Constitution and article I, section 17 of the Iowa Constitution. We review

constitutional claims de novo. See State v. Oliver, 812 N.W.2d 636, 639 (Iowa

2012).

Our supreme court’s most recent case on juvenile sentencing holds that

Love is entitled to the opportunity for parole. See State v. Sweet, 879 N.W.2d 3

811, 839 (Iowa 2016). As the record reflects, he presently has that opportunity.

Sweet also holds, however, that life sentences for juveniles are not

unconstitutional. See id. We decline to extend that case further, as Love urges.

We affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF A.H., Parent
879 N.W.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2016)
State of Iowa v. Jeffrey K. Ragland
836 N.W.2d 107 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2013)
State of Iowa v. Desirae Monique Pearson
836 N.W.2d 88 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2013)
State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony Null
836 N.W.2d 41 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2013)
State of Iowa v. Charles James David Oliver
812 N.W.2d 636 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2012)
State v. Lyle
854 N.W.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Iowa v. Bradley W. Love, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-bradley-w-love-iowactapp-2016.