State of Iowa v. Austine Thomas
This text of State of Iowa v. Austine Thomas (State of Iowa v. Austine Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 19-2087 Filed August 4, 2021
STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
AUSTINE THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Robert J. Richter,
District Associate Judge.
After pleading guilty, the defendant claims ineffective assistance on direct
appeal. AFFIRMED.
Stuart Hoover, East Dubuque, IL, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Israel Kodiaga, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Considered by Doyle, P.J., and Tabor and Greer, JJ. 2
GREER, Judge.
Austine Thomas pled guilty to eluding, interference with official acts,
reckless driving, driving on the wrong side of a two-way highway, and failure to
obey a traffic control device—none of which are class “A” felonies. Judgment was
entered against him in November 2019.
On appeal, Thomas claims he received ineffective assistance of counsel
because counsel allowed him to plead guilty without a factual basis to support his
pleas. But Iowa Code section 814.6(1)(a)(3) (Supp. 2019) limits the right to appeal
from a guilty plea.1 Because Thomas was not convicted of class “A” felonies, he
must establish good cause to appeal. See Iowa Code § 814.6(1)(a)(3). And
Thomas has not even attempted to do so. See State v. Thompson, 951 N.W.2d
1, 5 (Iowa 2020) (“[The defendant] bears the burden of establishing good cause to
pursue an appeal from [their] conviction based on a guilty plea.” (first alteration in
original)). And even if he could establish good cause to challenge his pleas,
section 814.7 prohibits us from deciding claims of ineffective assistance “on direct
appeal from criminal proceedings.”
Because Thomas raises no other issues on appeal, we affirm without further
consideration.
AFFIRMED.
1 Iowa Code sections 814.6 and 814.7 (Supp. 2019) took effect on July 1, 2019. The amended statutes apply to Thomas’s case. See State v. Tucker, 959 N.W.2d 140, 145 (Iowa 2021) (“The new legislation applies to this appeal because judgment and sentence was entered after the effective date of the bill.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Iowa v. Austine Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-iowa-v-austine-thomas-iowactapp-2021.