State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 24-12238
Non-Argument Calendar
STATE OF GEORGIA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus NADIRA A. PITTMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-02385-TCB
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12238
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . The district court’s order remanding the action to Georgia state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction is unreviewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (providing that a district court shall remand any case in which it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to the state court from which it was removed, and such a remand order is not reviewable on appeal); see also New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc., 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman (State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.