State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman
This text of State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman (State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-12238 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-12238 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
STATE OF GEORGIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NADIRA A. PITTMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-02385-TCB ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12238 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-12238
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. The district court’s order remanding the action to Georgia state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction is unre- viewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (providing that a district court shall remand any case in which it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to the state court from which it was removed, and such a remand order is not reviewable on appeal); see also New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc., 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-georgia-v-nadira-pittman-ca11-2024.