State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 8, 2024·No. 24-12238·Unpublished

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-12238 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-12238 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

STATE OF GEORGIA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NADIRA A. PITTMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:24-cv-02385-TCB ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-12238 Document: 6-1 Date Filed: 08/08/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-12238

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. The district court’s order remanding the action to Georgia state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction is unre- viewable on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), (d) (providing that a district court shall remand any case in which it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to the state court from which it was removed, and such a remand order is not reviewable on appeal); see also New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc., 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman, (11th Cir. 2024).

State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman (State of Georgia v. Nadira Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New v. Sports & Recreation, Inc.
114 F.3d 1092 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)