State Of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company

Fifth Circuit

State Of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company

453 F.2d 1366, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11543

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1972

Docket30693

StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1366 (State Of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company, 453 F.2d 1366, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 11543 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

453 F.2d 1366

STATE OF FLORIDA, for the Use and Benefit of WESTINGHOUSE
ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of
Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WESLEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 30693.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 1, 1972.

Richard E. Reckson, Eugene C. Heiman, of Heiman & Crary, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Martin E. Segal, Donald W. Stobs, Jr., Wesley G. Carey, Edward A. Perse, Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal & Stobs, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees Wesley and Aetna.

Before TUTTLE, WISDOM and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We are in agreement with the well considered memorandum opinion of the district court, State of Florida v. Wesley Construction Company, 316 F.Supp. 490 (S.D.Fla., 1970), and its judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI