State of Florida v. Victor Reed

Supreme Court of Florida

State of Florida v. Victor Reed

161 So. 3d 397, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 1565718

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 2015

DocketSC14-1801

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 161 So. 3d 397 (State of Florida v. Victor Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Florida v. Victor Reed, 161 So. 3d 397, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 1565718 (Fla. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Reed v. State, 159 So.3d 845, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D1672 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 7, 2014), a decision in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:

DOES A TRIAL COURT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER A PETITION FILED UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT AGAINST A PERSON WHO OBTAINS AN ORDER FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WHILE IN LAWFUL CUSTODY WHERE THE COMMITMENT PROCESS IS INITIATED UNDER SECTION 394.9135, FLORIDA STATUTES, AFTER THE PERSON’S SENTENCE EXPIRED BUT BEFORE HE IS ACTUALLY RELEASED?

*398 After further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI