STATE OF FLORIDA v. SCOTT BRADLEY RAPSON

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 2019
Docket18-4206
StatusPublished

This text of STATE OF FLORIDA v. SCOTT BRADLEY RAPSON (STATE OF FLORIDA v. SCOTT BRADLEY RAPSON) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STATE OF FLORIDA v. SCOTT BRADLEY RAPSON, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4206 ) SCOTT BRADLEY RAPSON, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed November 1, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nichols, Judge.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Nicole Joanne Martingano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Elba Caridad Martin- Schomaker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellant.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

MORRIS, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court's decision to withhold adjudication of guilt

following Scott Bradley Rapson's no contest plea to fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer in violation of section 316.1935(3), Florida Statutes (2017).1

Rapson concedes error on this point.

"Section 316.1935(6) expressly prohibits the court from withholding

adjudication of guilt for any violation of section 316.1935." State v. Teague, 275 So. 3d

828, 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (quoting State v. Culver, 63 So. 3d 891, 891 (Fla. 5th

DCA 2011)); see also State v. Warner, 50 So. 3d 99, 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); State v.

Scriber, 991 So. 2d 969, 970 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, we reverse that portion

of the sentencing order withholding adjudication of guilt for fleeing or attempting to elude

a law enforcement officer and we remand this matter to the trial court for further

proceedings. In all other respects, we affirm the sentencing order.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

1Rapson also entered a no contest plea to driving under the influence. However, the State is not challenging his conviction or sentence for that charge.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Scriber
991 So. 2d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
State v. Culver
63 So. 3d 891 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State v. Warner
50 So. 3d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
State v. Teague
275 So. 3d 828 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
STATE OF FLORIDA v. SCOTT BRADLEY RAPSON, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-v-scott-bradley-rapson-fladistctapp-2019.