STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 2019
Docket16-5322
StatusPublished

This text of STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF (STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5322 ) KEVIN RATLIFF, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed July 19, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of

Florida, which quashed this court's opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of

Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018), and State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 1401 (2019). See State v. Ratliff, No. SC17-2037, 2019

WL 1983467, at *1 (Fla. May 3, 2019). We reverse.

The State appeals a postconviction order declaring unconstitutional two

life sentences for the crimes of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder

committed by Kevin Ratliff when he was a juvenile. The postconviction court granted

relief under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48

(2010), as interpreted in Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). However, in

Franklin and Michel, the supreme court concluded that Atwell was wrongly decided.

Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1241; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 6-7. Because Ratliff is eligible for

parole, his life sentences are not unconstitutional under Miller and Graham. See

Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1241; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 6. We therefore reverse the

postconviction court's order.

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Angelo Atwell v. State of Florida
197 So. 3d 1040 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
State of Florida v. Budry Michel
257 So. 3d 3 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Arthur O'Derrell Franklin v. State of Florida
258 So. 3d 1239 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-v-kevin-ratliff-fladistctapp-2019.