STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF
This text of STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF (STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-5322 ) KEVIN RATLIFF, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)
Opinion filed July 19, 2019.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
PER CURIAM.
This case is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of
Florida, which quashed this court's opinion and remanded for reconsideration in light of
Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2018), and State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 1401 (2019). See State v. Ratliff, No. SC17-2037, 2019
WL 1983467, at *1 (Fla. May 3, 2019). We reverse.
The State appeals a postconviction order declaring unconstitutional two
life sentences for the crimes of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder
committed by Kevin Ratliff when he was a juvenile. The postconviction court granted
relief under Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), and Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48
(2010), as interpreted in Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016). However, in
Franklin and Michel, the supreme court concluded that Atwell was wrongly decided.
Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1241; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 6-7. Because Ratliff is eligible for
parole, his life sentences are not unconstitutional under Miller and Graham. See
Franklin, 258 So. 3d at 1241; Michel, 257 So. 3d at 6. We therefore reverse the
postconviction court's order.
Reversed.
NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
STATE OF FLORIDA v. KEVIN RATLIFF, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-v-kevin-ratliff-fladistctapp-2019.