STATE OF FLORIDA v. KENYATTA BETHLEY

268 So. 3d 254
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 12, 2019
Docket18-4143
StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 254 (STATE OF FLORIDA v. KENYATTA BETHLEY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STATE OF FLORIDA v. KENYATTA BETHLEY, 268 So. 3d 254 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4143 ) KENYATTA BETHLEY, ) ) Respondent. ) )

Opinion filed April 12, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Petitioner.

Julianne M. Holt, Public Defender, Tampa, for Respondent.

KELLY, Judge.

The State petitions for a writ of certiorari to review an order granting

Kenyatta Bethley's motion in limine to exclude from his trial statistical testimony

regarding DNA evidence. We grant the petition and quash the order. An expert need not be a statistician to testify regarding the statistical

significance of a DNA match. Darling v. State, 808 So. 2d 145, 158 (Fla. 2002).

However, the expert must "demonstrate a sufficient knowledge of the database

grounded in the study of authoritative sources." Id. (quoting Murray v. State, 692 So. 2d

157, 164 (Fla. 1997)); see also Butler v. State, 842 So. 2d 817, 828 (Fla. 2003) ("[A]

sufficient knowledge of the authorities pertinent to the database is an adequate basis on

which to render an opinion."). We conclude the State's expert satisfied this requirement

and therefore, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in

excluding her testimony. See State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250, 253 (Fla. 1988) (stating

that certiorari is the appropriate remedy to review nonfinal pretrial orders in criminal

cases which negatively affect the State's ability to prosecute).

Petition granted.

SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murray v. State
692 So. 2d 157 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
State v. Pettis
520 So. 2d 250 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Butler v. State
842 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Darling v. State
808 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 So. 3d 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-v-kenyatta-bethley-fladistctapp-2019.