State of Florida v. J.C., a child

141 So. 3d 756, 2014 WL 3187254, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10523
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 2014·No. 4D12-4176·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, C.J.

In this appeal, the State challenges the trial court’s order dismissing its petition for delinquency. We reverse and hold that the trial court impermissibly relied on section 985.0301(6), Florida Statutes (2011), to dismiss the petition before the adjudicatory hearing. See State v. W.D., 112 So.3d 702, 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

By way of background, the State filed a delinquency petition against J.C. in August of 2011, based on allegations that he punched another student in the school cafeteria. At the hearing on the petition more than a year later, the State informed the court that J.C. was living at a family shelter in New York. Defense counsel moved to dismiss the petition pursuant to section 985.0301(6), which permits the court “at any time [to] enter an order ending its jurisdiction over any child.” See § 985.0301(6), Fla. Stat. (2011). The trial court granted the motion over the State’s objection and dismissed the delinquency petition.

On appeal, the State argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition pursuant to our holding in W.D., 112 So.3d 702. There, we held that section 985.0301(6) allows the trial court to end its jurisdiction over a child only after the initial adjudicatory hearing. Id. at 704. The public defender concedes error based on W.D. Accordingly, we hold that the trial court impermissibly relied on section 985.0301(6) to terminate its jurisdiction over J.C. and “put an end to the prosecution before the case ever reache[d] adjudication on the merits.” See id. By dismissing the delinquency petition, the trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine by encroaching on the state attorney’s absolute authority to decide where and how to prosecute this case. See id. at 704-05. Thus, we reverse and remand the trial court’s order dismissing the State’s delinquency petition.

Reversed and Remanded.

FORST, J„ and HANZMAN, MICHAEL, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Florida v. J.C., a child, 141 So. 3d 756, 2014 WL 3187254, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10523 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

141 So. 3d 756 (State of Florida v. J.C., a child) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Florida v. H.C., a Child
177 So. 3d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State of Florida v. T.L., a child
178 So. 3d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State of Florida v. A.M., a child
178 So. 3d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State v. E.S.
177 So. 3d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State v. K.M.
177 So. 3d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State of Florida v. K.M., a child
177 So. 3d 310 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State of Florida v. E.S., a child
177 So. 3d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
State of Florida v. M.A., a child
174 So. 3d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)