State of Florida v. Dakari Clayton
This text of State of Florida v. Dakari Clayton (State of Florida v. Dakari Clayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 5, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0665 Lower Tribunal No. F20-12458A ________________
State of Florida, Appellant,
vs.
Dakari Clayton, Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michelle Delancy, Judge.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Cruz v. State, 320 So. 3d 695, 712 (Fla. 2021) (“A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress comes to the appellate court clothed
with a presumption of correctness and the court must interpret the evidence
and reasonable inferences and deductions derived therefrom in a manner
most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling.” (quoting Jackson v.
State, 18 So. 3d 1016, 1027 (Fla. 2009))).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Florida v. Dakari Clayton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-v-dakari-clayton-fladistctapp-2025.