State of Florida v. City of Hollywood

Supreme Court of Florida

State of Florida v. City of Hollywood

119 So. 397, 97 Fla. 18

DecidedJanuary 11, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 397 (State of Florida v. City of Hollywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Florida v. City of Hollywood, 119 So. 397, 97 Fla. 18 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

*19 See opinion in the ease of City of Venice, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee, filed October 23, 1928.

Terrell, C. J. and Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield and Ellis, J. J., dissent

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

*19 See opinion in the ease of City of Venice, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee, filed October 23, 1928.

Terrell, C. J. and Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield and Ellis, J. J., dissent

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 So. 397, 97 Fla. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-v-city-of-hollywood-fla-1929.