State of Florida, Ex Rel. v. Carlton

145 So. 258, 108 Fla. 127
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 18, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 145 So. 258 (State of Florida, Ex Rel. v. Carlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Florida, Ex Rel. v. Carlton, 145 So. 258, 108 Fla. 127 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon respondents’ motion to quash the amended alternative writ of mandamus herein, and the same having been submitted upon the written briefs and arguments of the parties, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given on the said motion to quash it, it seems to the Court that said motion to quash the amended alternative writ of mandamus *128 should be overruled, with leave to the respondents' to file a return to the writ within fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order.

The amended alternative writ of mandamus having been heretofore issued and served upon two members of the State Board of Administration who retired from office January 3, 1933, of which fact this Court takes judicial notice, permission to amend said alternative writ of mandamus by substitution,of the names of the new Governor and Comptroller of the State as parties respondent thereto, is hereby given to relator, and in default of such amendment being made within ten days from date of this order, the proceeding will stand dismissed at costs of relator.

It is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and 'Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 So. 258, 108 Fla. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-ex-rel-v-carlton-fla-1933.