State of Florida Department of Transportation v. National Advertising Co.

43 Fla. Supp. 2d 156
CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1989
DocketCase No. 86-26926 CG
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 156 (State of Florida Department of Transportation v. National Advertising Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Florida Department of Transportation v. National Advertising Co., 43 Fla. Supp. 2d 156 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1989).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PATRICIA W. COCALIS, Circuit Judge.

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE came before the Court, sitting by stipulation of the parties as trier of the facts and the law in this eminent domain compensation trial. The case was tried to the Court on September 19, 1989.

Although Defendant, NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, was the owner and holder of leasehold interests in both Parcels 108 and 109 at the time of the entry of an Order of Taking on Parcel 108, [157]*157Defendant’s lease had expired on the remaining Parcel 109 as of the date of trial; accordingly, Plaintiffs request for condemnation of Parcel 109 at trial is moot.

Having considered the testimony and exhibits offered by the parties, the Court finds that the market approach, based on a Gross Income Multiplier unit of comparison which is the industry standard, is the appropriate and proper approach to determine the fair market value of the Defendant’s (National Advertising Company) leasehold and improvements.

The Court further finds that a gross income multiplier of four times billing (less agency commissions) is reasonable and, accordingly, full compensation is the sum of $189,128.00.

Accordingly, it is:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that full compensation due the Defendant, NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, for the taking of parcel 108 in this proceeding, together with the improvements thereon, is the,sum of $184,128.00, and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant against Petitioner in that amount It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Petitioner shall deposit into the Court Registry the sum of $167,738.94, in addition to the amount of $16,389.06 previously deposited in conjunction with the Order of Taking, for a t^cal payment of $184,128.00 in satisfaction of this judgment within twenty (20) days.

The Court retains jurisdiction of this cause to award Defendant’s attorney’s fees and costs and to enter orders disbursing funds and taxing interest in accordance with law.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, at Fort Lauderdale, Bro-ward County, Florida, this 23rd day of October, 1989.

Editor’s Note: Petitioner, State of Florida Department of Transportation served a notice of appeal of the foregoing decision. The appeal was dismissed prior to the filing of briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Fla. Supp. 2d 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-department-of-transportation-v-national-advertising-co-flacirct-1989.