State of Florida, Department of Corrections v. Tammy Pate

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 2019
Docket17-4562
StatusPublished

This text of State of Florida, Department of Corrections v. Tammy Pate (State of Florida, Department of Corrections v. Tammy Pate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Florida, Department of Corrections v. Tammy Pate, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-4562 _____________________________

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Appellant,

v.

TAMMY PATE,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James O. Shelfer, Judge.

January 10, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The Department of Corrections appeals the final judgment in favor of Appellee in this retaliatory discharge case. The Department argues that the trial court erred in denying its motions for directed verdict because Appellee failed to prove a causal link between her firing and a prior discrimination suit she filed against the Department. We agree because the “cat’s paw” theory of liability advanced by Appellee at trial is largely foreclosed by this court’s decision in State v. Bracewell, 220 So. 3d 1228 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), 1 and was not otherwise supported by the evidence. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the Department.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Glen A. Bassett, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Marie A. Mattox, Marie A. Mattox P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.

1 The trial court did not have the benefit of the Bracewell opinion at the time of the trial. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Florida, Department of Corrections v. Carolann Bracewell and Ted Jeter
220 So. 3d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Florida, Department of Corrections v. Tammy Pate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-florida-department-of-corrections-v-tammy-pate-fladistctapp-2019.