STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee
This text of 194 N.W.2d 766 (STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state appeals from a district court order which held that Louis Lee had reasonable grounds to refuse to submit to a chemical alcohol test under the implied-consent statute. Minn. St. 1969, § 169.123. Mr. Lee’s reason for his refusal is that he was confused when the arresting patrolman explained both the Miranda warnings and the rights and responsibilities of the implied-consent law. We affirm.
The facts and legal issue of this case are in all material respects identical with State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 192 N. W. 2d 441 (1971). We find that the district court’s order was not so clearly erroneous as to compel reversal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 473, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-department-of-highways-v-lee-minn-1972.