STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee

194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 473, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1346
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 4, 1972
Docket43012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 N.W.2d 766 (STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee, 194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 473, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1346 (Mich. 1972).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The state appeals from a district court order which held that Louis Lee had reasonable grounds to refuse to submit to a chemical alcohol test under the implied-consent statute. Minn. St. 1969, § 169.123. Mr. Lee’s reason for his refusal is that he was confused when the arresting patrolman explained both the Miranda warnings and the rights and responsibilities of the implied-consent law. We affirm.

The facts and legal issue of this case are in all material respects identical with State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 192 N. W. 2d 441 (1971). We find that the district court’s order was not so clearly erroneous as to compel reversal.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Todd, not having been a member of this court at the time of the submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State, Department of Public Safety v. Stavaas
227 N.W.2d 819 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.W.2d 766, 292 Minn. 473, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-department-of-highways-v-lee-minn-1972.