State of Delaware v. Petty.

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedDecember 30, 2014
Docket1009000052
StatusPublished

This text of State of Delaware v. Petty. (State of Delaware v. Petty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Delaware v. Petty., (Del. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) LEVAL PETTY, ) Cr. ID. No. 1009000052 ) Defendant. ) )

Submitted: November 13, 2014 Decided: December 30, 2014

Upon Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation that Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief Should be Denied and Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw Should be Granted.

ADOPTED

ORDER

This 30th day of December, 2014, the Court has considered the

Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation.

On August 10, 2013, Defendant Leval Petty filed a pro se motion for

postconviction relief. Subsequently, Defendant was assigned counsel. Assigned

counsel then filed a Motion to Withdraw as Postconviction Counsel pursuant to

Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(e)(2). The motions were referred to a Superior

Court Commissioner in accordance with 10 Del. C. § 512(b) and Superior Court Criminal Rule 62 for proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The

Commissioner issued the Report and Recommendation on November 3, 2014. The

Commissioner recommended that Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief be

denied, and that Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw should be granted.

“Within ten days after filing of a Commissioner’s proposed findings of fact

and recommendations . . . any party may serve and file written objections.” 1

Neither party has filed an objection to the Commissioner’s Report and

Recommendation.

The Court holds that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation

dated November 3, 2014 should be adopted for the reasons set forth therein. The

Commissioner’s findings are not clearly erroneous, are not contrary to law, and are

not an abuse of discretion.2

THEREFORE, the Court hereby accepts the Commissioner’s Report and

Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/__Mary M. Johnston________ The Honorable Mary M. Johnston

1 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(5)(ii). 2 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(4)(iv).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 512
Delaware § 512(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Delaware v. Petty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-delaware-v-petty-delsuperct-2014.