Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State of Connecticut v. Ryder

State of Connecticut v. Ryder

974 A.2d 723, 292 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 270
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 8, 2009·No. SC 18411·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 528 (AC 28448), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*920 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18411. Gary Ryder, pro se, in support of the petition. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided July 8, 2009

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress?”

KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Connecticut v. Ryder, 974 A.2d 723, 292 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 270 (Colo. 2009).

974 A.2d 723 (State of Connecticut v. Ryder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ryder
23 A.3d 694 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
State v. DeMarco
5 A.3d 527 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
State v. Begley
2 A.3d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Rissolo v. Betts Island Oyster Farms, LLC
979 A.2d 534 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
State v. Banks
978 A.2d 519 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)