State of Connecticut v. Ryder
974 A.2d 723, 292 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 270
This text of 974 A.2d 723 (State of Connecticut v. Ryder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State of Connecticut v. Ryder, 974 A.2d 723, 292 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 270 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 528 (AC 28448), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress?”
KATZ, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Ryder
23 A.3d 694 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
State v. DeMarco
5 A.3d 527 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
State v. Begley
2 A.3d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Rissolo v. Betts Island Oyster Farms, LLC
979 A.2d 534 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
State v. Banks
978 A.2d 519 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
974 A.2d 723, 292 Conn. 919, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-connecticut-v-ryder-conn-2009.