State of Connecticut v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State of Connecticut v. Lewis

973 A.2d 105, 292 Conn. 906, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 334

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 3, 2009

DocketSC 18369

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 973 A.2d 105 (State of Connecticut v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Connecticut v. Lewis, 973 A.2d 105, 292 Conn. 906, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 334 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 731 (AC 28791), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether, for the purposes of proof of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to sell the narcotics that he possessed at the specific location where he was apprehended, which was within 1500 feet of a school?

“2. Whether, for purposes of proof of both General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school, and General Statutes § 2 la-267 (c), possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use within 1500 feet of a school, a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence that the school in question was an elementary or secondary school?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 113 Conn. App. 731 (AC 28791), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether, for the purposes of proof of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to sell the narcotics that he possessed at the specific location where he was apprehended, which was within 1500 feet of a school?

“2. Whether, for purposes of proof of both General Statutes § 21a-278a (b), possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school, and General Statutes § 2 la-267 (c), possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use within 1500 feet of a school, a majority of the Appellate Court panel properly held that there was insufficient evidence that the school in question was an elementary or secondary school?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

973 A.2d 105, 292 Conn. 906, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-connecticut-v-lewis-conn-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack