State of Connecticut v. Gibson
973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272
Opinion
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 295 (AC 28273), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial prosecutor’s two uses of the words ‘I think’ while marshaling the evidence during closing argument amounted to prosecutorial impropriety? If so, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the alleged impropriety deprived the defendant of the due process right to a fair trial?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State of Connecticut v. Gibson, 973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272 (Colo. 2009).
973 A.2d 1276 (State of Connecticut v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Gibson
31 A.3d 346 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)