State of Connecticut v. Gibson

973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 30, 2009·No. SC 18402·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 295 (AC 28273), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial prosecutor’s two uses of the words ‘I think’ while marshaling the evidence during closing argument amounted to prosecutorial impropriety? If so, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the alleged impropriety deprived the defendant of the due process right to a fair trial?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State of Connecticut v. Gibson, 973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272 (Colo. 2009).

973 A.2d 1276 (State of Connecticut v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gibson
31 A.3d 346 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)