Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State of Connecticut v. Gibson

State of Connecticut v. Gibson

973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 30, 2009
DocketSC 18402
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 973 A.2d 1276 (State of Connecticut v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Connecticut v. Gibson, 973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272 (Colo. 2009).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn. App. 295 (AC 28273), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial prosecutor’s two uses of the words ‘I think’ while marshaling the evidence during closing argument amounted to prosecutorial impropriety? If so, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the alleged impropriety deprived the defendant of the due process right to a fair trial?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gibson
31 A.3d 346 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
973 A.2d 1276, 292 Conn. 916, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-connecticut-v-gibson-conn-2009.