State of Arizona v. Lane-Whaites P. Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

State of Arizona v. Lane-Whaites P. Co.

143 P.2d 883, 61 Ariz. 50

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 13, 1943

DocketCriminal No. 937.

StatusPublished

This text of 143 P.2d 883 (State of Arizona v. Lane-Whaites P. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State of Arizona v. Lane-Whaites P. Co., 143 P.2d 883, 61 Ariz. 50 (Ark. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

This case involves the same legal points as those in State v.Ikeda, ante, p. 41, 143 P.2d 880, just decided, and is controlled by the decision in that case.

Judgment affirmed.

ROSS and STANFORD, JJ., and WM. G. HALL, Superior Judge, concur.

Note: Because of the illness of Chief Justice McALISTER, the Honorable WM. G. HALL, Judge of the Superior Court of Pima County, was called in to sit in his place and stead. *Page 51

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case involves the same legal points as those in State v.Ikeda, ante, p. 41, 143 P.2d 880, just decided, and is controlled by the decision in that case.

Judgment affirmed.

ROSS and STANFORD, JJ., and WM. G. HALL, Superior Judge, concur.

Note: Because of the illness of Chief Justice McALISTER, the Honorable WM. G. HALL, Judge of the Superior Court of Pima County, was called in to sit in his place and stead. *Page 51

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 P.2d 883, 61 Ariz. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-arizona-v-lane-whaites-p-co-ariz-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack