State of Arizona v. Dayton
This text of 156 P.2d 724 (State of Arizona v. Dayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, William Arthur Dayton, appealed from a conviction of sodomy. The record and transcript of minute entries and testimony taken at the trial were filed in this court. No briefs were filed nor other proceedings taken on behalf of appellant.
We have examined the information and proceedings in the lower court. The information properly states the offense of which appellant was convicted. The transcript of the testimony discloses that the evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury to find a verdict of guilty. The instructions of the court correctly state the law applicable to the facts and to the charge. We find no reversible error.
The judgment is affirmed.
STANFORD, C.J., and LAPRADE and MORGAN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 P.2d 724, 62 Ariz. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-arizona-v-dayton-ariz-1945.