State of Arizona v. Allen
This text of 112 P.2d 206 (State of Arizona v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Albert Allen, appeals from a conviction of burglary in the first degree. He has done nothing except to invoke the aid of the law to have the record, including a somewhat voluminous transcript of the evidence, filed in this court. We have examined the information and find it properly states the offense of which appellant was convicted. The evidence of his guilt is overwhelming and the instructions to the jury correctly state the law applicable to the facts. We find no reason for the appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
LOCKWOOD, C.J., and McALISTER and ROSS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 P.2d 206, 57 Ariz. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-arizona-v-allen-ariz-1941.