State National Bank v. Waxahachie National Bank
This text of 35 S.W. 1083 (State National Bank v. Waxahachie National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion.—Appellee, as plaintiff, brought this suit against the State National Bank of Vernon, E. B. Gaut, F. M. Mabry and A. U. Thomas, as defendants.
The original petition connects the defendant Thomas as purchaser under a sale made by defendant Mabry as trustee, with the transaction which, in part, forms the basis of the plaintiff’s suit; and specific and appropriate relief is asked in said petition as against Thomas; and we find nothing in the record showing that the plaintiff dismissed as to him.
The judgment recites that the defendant A. TJ. Thomas was duly cited; that he failed to answer, but made default; but it nowhere disposes of him as a party to the suit, nor of the cause of action set forth against him in the plaintiff’s petition.
Such being the case, it is not a final judgment, and therefore this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Simpson v. Bennett, 42 Texas, 241; Linn v. Arambauld, 55 Texas, 611; Railway v. Railway, 68 Texas, 98; Mignon v. Brinson, 74 Texas, 18; Mills v. Paul, 23 S. W. Rep., 189; Mills v. Paul, 23 S. W. Rep., 395. The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed•
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 S.W. 1083, 14 Tex. Civ. App. 143, 1896 Tex. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-national-bank-v-waxahachie-national-bank-texapp-1896.