State in the Interest of G.M.A. & K.K.A.

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 6, 2018
DocketJAC-0018-0153
StatusUnknown

This text of State in the Interest of G.M.A. & K.K.A. (State in the Interest of G.M.A. & K.K.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State in the Interest of G.M.A. & K.K.A., (La. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

18-153

STATE IN THE INTEREST OF G.M.A. & K.K.A.

**********

APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 27795 HONORABLE W. MITCHELL REDD, DISTRICT JUDGE

MARC T. AMY JUDGE

Court composed of Ulysses Gene Thibodeaux, Chief Judge, Marc T. Amy, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.

AFFIRMED.

Bethany Blackson Calcasieu Parish District Attorney’s Office 901 Lakeshore Drive Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 437-3400 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana

Nicholas Pizzolatto, Jr. Department of Children & Family Services 1919 Kirkman Street Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 491-2470 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: State of Louisiana, Department of Children & Family Services Richard D. Moreno Richard D. Moreno, LLC 125 W. School Street Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 433-9535 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: T.A.

Mike K. Stratton Public Defender’s Office 1032 Ryan Street Lake Charles, LA 70601 (337) 436-1718 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: K.D.

Ann McSpadden Child Advocacy Program One Lakeshore Drive, Suite 1110 Lake Charles, LA 70629 (337) 491-2461 COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES: G.M.A. K.K.A. AMY, Judge.

As noted in the companion matter of Tracy Alexander v. State of Louisiana,

Dep’t of Children and Family Services, 18-154 (La.App. 3 Cir. _/_/18), _ So.3d _, the

appellant’s motion for appeal, as well as the corresponding order of appeal, included

the captions and the trial court docket numbers of both the petition for nullity as well

as the underlying termination of parental rights proceedings. The appellate record of

each matter was lodged with this court. While the instant docket number is the appeal

filed from the petition for termination of parental rights, we note that the appellant

does not brief issues relating to the merits of the termination matter. Those issues are,

therefore, not addressed further herein. See Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule

2-12.4(B)(4) (providing that “[a]ll assignments of error and issues for review must be

briefed. The court may consider as abandoned any assignment of error or issue for

review which has not been briefed.”) Therefore, we leave the underlying judgment

undisturbed. See also State in the Interest of G.M.A. & K.K.A., 16-405 (La.App. 3

Cir. 9/28/16), 201 So.3d 104, writ denied, 16-1945 (La. 11/18/16), 210 So.2d 290.

All costs of this appeal are assessed against Tracy Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wing v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.
132 So. 526 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)
Washington v. State
210 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State in the Interest of G.M.A. & K.K.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-in-the-interest-of-gma-kka-lactapp-2018.