State in Interest of Jashua

327 So. 2d 429
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 12, 1976
Docket7633
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 327 So. 2d 429 (State in Interest of Jashua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State in Interest of Jashua, 327 So. 2d 429 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

327 So.2d 429 (1976)

STATE of Louisiana In the Interest of Clifton Antoine JOSHUA.

No. 7633.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

February 5, 1976.
Writs Refused February 6 and March 12, 1976.

PEREMPTORY WRIT

Relator's application for writs is directed to the refusal of the Juvenile Court for the Parish of Orleans to grant a preliminary examination (probable cause hearing).

Relator was arrested on January 11, 1976 and subsequently on January 14, 1976 a petition was filed alleging him to be a delinquent in that he had violated LSA-R.S. 14:64 relative to robbery and LSA-R.S. 14:27(64) relative to attempted armed robbery. On January 15, 1976 a detention hearing was held at which time relator presented to the court a motion for a preliminary examination (probable cause hearing) which was denied by the Judge conducting the detention hearing. The relator was detained (LSA-R.S. 13:1578.1) in the New Orleans Youth Study Center in lieu of bond. The motion for a preliminary examination was presented on January 20, 1976, to the Judge of the section of the Court to which relator's case is alloted and the motion was again denied.

Relator has been proceeded against via a petition (a sworn affidavit of the charges; See LSA-R.S. 13:1574). Pugh v. Rainwater, 332 F.Supp. 1107, 1114, (S.D.Fla.1971), aff'd 483 F.2d 778 (5th Cir. 1973), aff'd sub nom., Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975) requires that an accused adult be accorded a preliminary hearing to challenge a pre-trial incarceration under the standard of probable cause when such pre-trial incarceration is pursuant to anything other than a grand jury indictment. See LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 292. Juvenile relator is entitled to the same constitutional safeguards as an adult. See In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967); Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 16 L.Ed.2d 84 (1966); Louisiana Constitution of 1974, Art. 1, §§ 2 and 3; In re State In Interest of McGinnis, 244 So.2d 336 (La.App. 1971); In re Williams, 221 So.2d 58 (La.App. 1969).

*430 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Edward G. Gillen, Judge, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, or any other Judge of said Court is directed to grant relator, Clifton Antoine Joshua, a preliminary examination (probable cause hearing) not later than twenty-four (24) hours from the date and time of this order.

New Orleans, Louisiana this 5th day of February 1976 at 3:50 o'clock P.M.

(s) ERNEST N. MORIAL, JUDGE

(s) WILLIAM V. REDMANN, JUDGE

(s) PATRICK M. SCHOTT, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dawson
775 So. 2d 1046 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2000)
R.W.T., K.M.R., and T.S.C., Minors, by and Through Their Next Friends and Attorneys, Kenneth A. Cohn, Robert J. Goodwin, Michael L. Lyons, Jeanette Ganousis, David C. Howard, and Adrienne E. Volenik, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Honorable Donald E. Dalton the Honorable David Dalton the Honorable Fred Rush the Honorable Charles R. Schroeder the Honorable William T. Lohmar the Honorable Richard Zerr and the Honorable Kathie Guyton, the Honorable Paul Williams the Honorable Charles Schwendemann the Honorable Peggy Coppage the Honorable Donald Boehmer Guy L. Koester, Sheriff Cliston Hilton, Sheriff Dave Jenkins, Sheriff Raymond J. Grush, Juvenile Officer and Gerald W. Paul, Deputy Juvenile Officer, R.W.T., K.M.R., and T.S.C., Minors, by and Through Their Next Friends and Attorneys, Kenneth A. Cohn, Robert J. Goodwin, Michael L. Lyons, Jeanette Ganousis, David C. Howard, and Adrienne E. Volenik, on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Honorable Donald E. Dalton the Honorable David Dalton the Honorable Fred Rush the Honorable Charles R. Schroeder the Honorable William T. Lohmar the Honorable Richard Zerr the Honorable Kathie Guyton the Honorable Paul Williams the Honorable Charles Schwendemann the Honorable Peggy Coppage the Honorable Donald Boehmer Guy L. Koester, Sheriff Cliston Hilton, Sheriff Dave Jenkins, Sheriff Raymond J. Grush, Juvenile Officer and Gerald W. Paul, Deputy Juvenile Officer
712 F.2d 1225 (Eighth Circuit, 1983)
R.W.T. ex rel Cohn v. Dalton
712 F.2d 1225 (Eighth Circuit, 1983)
State ex rel. Morrison
406 So. 2d 246 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
State ex rel. Joshua
329 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 So. 2d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-in-interest-of-jashua-lactapp-1976.