State in Interest of BD
This text of 266 A.2d 303 (State in Interest of BD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, IN THE INTEREST OF B.D., A JUVENILE, JUVENILE-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. David S. Baime, Assistant Prosecutor of Essex County, argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. Donald H. Mintz argued the cause for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division. 110 N.J. Super. 585.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 A.2d 303, 56 N.J. 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-in-interest-of-bd-nj-1970.