State in Interest of BD
266 A.2d 303, 56 N.J. 325
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, IN THE INTEREST OF B.D., A JUVENILE, JUVENILE-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. David S. Baime, Assistant Prosecutor of Essex County, argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor, attorney).
Mr. Donald H. Mintz argued the cause for the respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division. 110 N.J. Super. 585.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State in Interest of BD, 266 A.2d 303, 56 N.J. 325 (N.J. 1970).
266 A.2d 303 (State in Interest of BD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. B. D.
266 A.2d 303 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)