State Highway Department v. Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
This text of 594 So. 2d 1207 (State Highway Department v. Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Dyess Outdoor Advertising is due to be reversed on the authority of State Highway Department v. Headrick Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 594 So.2d 1202 (Ala.1992).
Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand this case for a determination of whether the billboards in question were erected and are being maintained illegally and must, therefore, be removed; and if so, for a determination of whether Dyess Outdoor Advertising is entitled to just compensation for the removal of the signs from the State Highway Department and, if so, what amount would justly compensate Dyess for their removal.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 So. 2d 1207, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 91, 1992 WL 28974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-highway-department-v-dyess-outdoor-advertising-inc-ala-1992.