State Highway Department v. Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

594 So. 2d 1207, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 91, 1992 WL 28974
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 21, 1992
Docket1901460
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 1207 (State Highway Department v. Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Highway Department v. Dyess Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 594 So. 2d 1207, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 91, 1992 WL 28974 (Ala. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Dyess Outdoor Advertising is due to be reversed on the authority of State Highway Department v. Headrick Outdoor Advertising, Inc., 594 So.2d 1202 (Ala.1992).

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand this case for a determination of whether the billboards in question were erected and are being maintained illegally and must, therefore, be removed; and if so, for a determination of whether Dyess Outdoor Advertising is entitled to just compensation for the removal of the signs from the State Highway Department and, if so, what amount would justly compensate Dyess for their removal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamar Advertising v. State Dot.
694 So. 2d 1256 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 1207, 1992 Ala. LEXIS 91, 1992 WL 28974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-highway-department-v-dyess-outdoor-advertising-inc-ala-1992.